Could We Terraform Mars? PBS Space Time English Spanish

Could We Terraform Mars?YouTube↗ IA↗(long shot)
Education 2.1M views 42.1K likes 16 Sep 2019

PBS Space Time 3.5M subscribers United States YouTube↗

Click to Play Video

Thanks to LEGO – presenting LEGO City - for their support of PBS Digital Studios.

Gracias a lego - que presentan LEGO City- por su ayuda de PBS Digital Studios.

Humanity’s future is glorious.

El futuro de la humanidad es glorioso.

As we master space travel, we’ll hop from one cold dead world to the next. Terraforming as we go.

A medida que dominamos los viajes espaciales, saltaremos de un mundo sin vida al siguiente.

Life will blossom in our path and eventually the galaxy will shimmer with beautiful Earth-like orbs.

La vida florecerá en nuestro camino y la galaxia brillará con hermosos orbes parecidos a la Tierra.

I mean... maybe.

Sounds a little science-fictiony. But it wouldn't sound so far fetched if we proved we could do it at least once.

Esto no parecerá tan descabellado si demostramos que podemos hacerlo al menos una vez.

If we successfully terraformed Mars.

Si conseguimos terraformar Marte.

We already have the technology to bring humans to Mars and to set up small settlements

Ya tenemos la tecnología para llevar a gente de manera segura a Marte y construir pequeños refugios.

- or at least we could do within a generation.

O al menos podríamos hacerlo dentro de una generación.

But those settlements will need to be cocooned - shielded against the deadly cold, the intense radiation

Pero esos asentamientos necesitarán ser protegidos, protegidos contra el frío mortal, intensa

and the fatal lack of atmospheric pressure.

radiación, y la falta de presión atmosférica.

Surely if we want to thrive on Mars – to turn it into our second home – these settlers,

Seguramente si queremos prosperar en Marte, para convertirnos en nuestro segundo hogar, estos colonos,

or their descendants, will need to be able open the airlocks, shed their spacesuits,

o sus descendientes, deberán poder abrir las esclusas de aire, deshacerse de sus trajes espaciales,

and step out onto a survivable surface.

y salir a una superficie de supervivencia.

We’ll need to terraform Mars, as our first step to terraforming the galaxy.

Tendremos que terraformar Marte, como nuestro primer paso para terraformar la galaxia.

Terraforming Mars has long been a science fiction dream – from Kim Stanley Robinson’s

Terraformar Marte ha sido durante mucho tiempo un sueño de ciencia ficción, de Kim Stanley Robinson

Mars trilogy to Total Recall to the Red Faction game series to Elon Musk’s Twitter feed.

But what would it really take?

¿Pero qué se necesitaría realmente?

How science-fiction-y is the whole concept of terraforming?

¿Qué tan ciencia-ficción es todo el concepto de terraformación?

In the end it’s a question of atmosphere.

Al final es una cuestión de atmósfera.

Mars’ current atmospheric pressure is 0.6% that of Earth – and that means circulatory shutdown

La presión atmosférica actual de Marte es del 0.6% de la de la Tierra, lo que significa la muerte

within a minute for an unprotected humans.

en un minuto para humanos desprotegidos.

But it also means almost no greenhouse effect.

Pero también significa que casi no hay efecto invernadero.

Light from the Sun, which is already fainter due to Mars’ distance – is radiated directly

La luz del Sol, que ya es más débil debido a la distancia de Marte, se irradia directamente

back out into space.

On Earth that same light first bounces around in our thick atmosphere, heating it up.

En la Tierra, esa misma luz rebota en nuestra espesa atmósfera, calentándola.

At an average of -60 Celsius, water freezes on Mars.

A un promedio de -60 grados Celsius, el agua se congela en Marte.

But even if the planet were warmer, liquid water would still be impossible in that thin

Pero incluso si el planeta fuera más cálido, el agua líquida aún sería imposible en esa delgada

atmosphere – it sublimates directly from ice to gas.

atmosfera - se sublima directamente del hielo en gas.

And of course Earth’s atmosphere protects us from harmful cosmic rays and the most dangerous

Y, por supuesto, la atmósfera de la Tierra nos protege de los dañinos rayos cósmicos y de los más peligrosos.

ultraviolet radiation from the Sun.

radiación ultravioleta del sol.

All of that bad stuff has a direct path to the Martian surface.

Todas esas cosas malas tienen un camino directo a la superficie marciana.

So, the most important step in terraforming Mars is to give it an atmosphere –

Entonces, el paso más importante para terraformar Marte es darle una atmósfera, preferiblemente

ideally as close to Earth’s as possible.

como la de la Tierra

In the imaginations of sci-fi writers all we need to do is unlock the planet’s latent potential.

En la imaginación de los escritores de ciencia ficción, todo lo que tenemos que

After all, Mars WAS once a warmer, watery planet with a much thicker atmosphere.

hacer es desbloquear el latente potencial del planeta. Después de todo, Marte fue una vez un planeta más cálido y acuoso con una atmósfera mucho más espesa.

I mean, that's conclusive – our rovers and orbiters have found incontrovertible evidence

Esto es concluyente: nuestros rovers y orbitadores han encontrado evidencia incontrovertible de

of an ancient watery surface.

Antigua superficie acuosa.

The hope then, is that this water and the atmosphere that once supported it is now all

La esperanza, entonces, es que esta agua y la atmósfera que una vez lo sostuvieron ahora esta todo

locked in the planet’s crust and ice caps.

encerrado en la corteza y los casquetes polares del planeta.

We just need to release it.

Solo necesitamos liberarlo.

Surely we can just nuke the poles, melt enough carbon dioxide and water vapor to kickstart

Seguramente podemos bombardear los polos, derretir suficiente dióxido de carbono y vapor de agua para iniciar un ciclo de

a feedback cycle of greenhouse warming and that'll release more gases… and voila!

retroalimentación del calentamiento del invernadero que liberará más gases ... y listo, la Tierra

OK, not so fast.

No tan rápido.

There’s a real risk that Mars actually lost its atmosphere to space, rather than absorbed

Existe un riesgo real de que Marte realmente pierda su atmósfera en el espacio

it into the surface.

en lugar de absorberla en su superficie.

The issue is that the planet is relatively puny.

El problema es que el planeta es relativamente pequeño.

At 11% the mass of Earth, it has a weaker gravitational field that grips less tightly

Con un 11% de la masa de la Tierra, tiene un campo gravitacional más débil

to an atmosphere.

que se adhiere con menos fuerza a una atmósfera.

And that small size means that the Martian core cooled down more quickly than Earth’s core,

Y ese pequeño tamaño significa que el núcleo marciano se enfrió más rápido que el de la Tierra,

solidifying long ago and shutting down its global magnetic field.

solidificándose hace mucho tiempo y cerrando su campo magnético global.

Earth’s magnetic field protects us from the solar wind, as we saw in a recent episode.

El campo magnético de la Tierra nos protege del viento solar, como vimos recientemente.

The unprotected and loosely bound Martian atmosphere may have been slowly shaved away

La atmósfera marciana desprotegida y débilmente ligada

by that wind over billions of years.

puede haber sido rapada lentamente por ese viento durante miles de millones de años.

And in fact that is exactly what happened.

Y de hecho, eso es exactamente lo que sucedió.

The ablation of what is left of the Martian atmosphere has now been directly observed by NASA’s

La ablación de lo que queda de la atmósfera marciana ahora ha sido observada directamente

MAVEN spacecraft, as we’ve also discussed before.

por la nave espacial MAVEN de la NASA, como también hemos discutido antes.

And the lack of atmospheric material in the crust has been confirmed pretty conclusively

Y la falta de material atmosférico en la corteza ha sido confirmada de manera bastante

by observations of the Martian surface.

concluyente por observaciones de la superficie marciana. Aprende a pronunciar Abrir en el Traductor de Google Enviar comentarios Resultados web Traductor de Google https://translate.google.es › ... El servicio gratuito de Google traduce instantáneamente palabras, frases y páginas web del español a más de 100 idiomas y viceversa. Noticias destacadas Google Translate ‘trolea’ a Mia Khalifa y arroja un polémico mensaje sobre ella [FOTOS] LaRepublica.pe Hace 1 día Google Translate 'trolea' a Vin Diesel y los fans de 'Rápidos y furiosos' reaccionan así Mag Hace 10 horas ¿Donald Trump usó Google Translate para sus tuits contra la inmigración? Esta es la verdad Mag Hace 16 horas Más sobre translate Resultados web Google Translate https://translate.google.com › ... Google's free service instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages. translate - English-Spanish Dictionary - WordReference.com https://www.wordreference.com › translation › tranword=translate translate - Translation to Spanish, pronunciation, and forum discussions. TRADUCTOR de Cambridge | inglés español https://dictionary.cambridge.org › translate En primer lugar, elige de qué idioma a qué idioma quieres traducir. A continuación, escribe un texto de hasta 160 caracteres cada vez, hasta 2.000 por día y haz ... Google Traductor https://translate.google.com.co El servicio gratuito de Google traduce al instante palabras, frases y páginas web del español a más de cien idiomas. Traductor en línea gratuito - Translate.com https://www.translate.com › ... Utilice translate.com para traducir palabras, frases y textos entre más de 90 pares de idiomas. Puede utilizar nuestro diccionario con ejemplos y obtener una ... translate from - Spanish translation – Linguee https://www.linguee.com › english-spanish › translation › translate+from Many translated example sentences containing "translate from" – Spanish-English dictionary and search engine for Spanish translations. Descargar y usar el Traductor de Google - Android - Ayuda de ... https://support.google.com › translate › answer Paso 1: Descarga la aplicación Traductor de Google. Para empezar, descarga la aplicación Traductor de Google para Android. Nota: Para traducir imágenes ... Ayuda de Google Translate - Google Support https://support.google.com › translate Esta información y este contenido de ayuda. Experiencia general del Centro de Ayuda. Siguiente. ¿Cómo podemos ayudarte? Empezar a utilizar el Traductor ... Búsquedas relacionadas con translate traductor el mundo traductor ingles traductor español frances traductor frances traductor de ingles a español google gratis traductor ingles español traductor wordreference linguee Navegación de páginas 1 2 3 4 concluyente por observaciones de la superficie marciana.

In a nice Nature Astronomy article last year, planetary scientists Bruce Jakosky and Christopher Edwards calculate the plausibility of using the remaining surface carbon dioxide to replenish

En un buen artículo de Nature Astronomy el año pasado, los científicos planetarios Bruce Jakosky y Christopher

the Martian atmosphere, based on observations of NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Mars Odyssey spacecraft.

They focus on CO2 because it’s the only plausible greenhouse molecule in any significant

abundance on Mars.

They assess whether release of the accessible CO2 reserves could get Mars anywhere near

Earth’s atmospheric pressure.

And… unfortunately they conclude that no near-future technology could hope to to kickstart

the recovery of any useful atmosphere.

But, you know what?

Let’s go ahead and run the numbers real quick, because maybe something is still possible.

After all, these researchers only ruled out NEAR future technology.

What about medium future?

So there are 3 broad sources for CO2 on Mars.

First there’s the south polar icecap – which consists of water ice several kilometers deep,

interspersed with thick layers of CO2 ice – discovered by radar soundings with the

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

If all the polar CO2 were released, it would maybe double the current amount of CO2 in

the atmosphere – which is a factor of around 100 times too low to make a difference.

And by the way, that CO2 couldn’t be released with nukes alone - it’s too deep.

The second accessible source is CO2 absorbed into the surface dust – the regolith - up to 100m deep.

Unlike, for example, Earth’s permafrost, this stuff wouldn’t just melt under global warming.

It would shift in its equilibrium over 10,000 years to release a small fraction of its CO2.

At any rate, even if we managed to heat the entire regolith across the entire Martian surface

we’d only get 4% of the Earth’s atmospheric pressure.

The final source is carbonate minerals in the crust.

These carbonates would need to be mined and processed by heating to around 300 Celsius.

But complete strip-mining of even the largest carbonate surface deposits on Mars probably get you less carbon

than melting the polar ice caps. So much for near-future accessible carbon.

But those carbonate minerals probably exist in much larger quantities deep beneath the surface.

And that’s really our only hope to find enough CO2 - or really any native Martian

material - to replenish the atmosphere.

Let’s do a quick calculation to see what it would take.

First, let’s pretend there’s an accessible layer of limestone – calcium carbonate – across

the entire surface of Mars.

There isn’t, but hey, we’re dreamers.

We need about 10,000 kg of material per square meter to duplicate Earth’s atmospheric pressure.

Seriously, that’s how much atmosphere is above your head right now.

No wonder it’s so hard getting out of bed in the morning.

High density limestone is 2500 kg/m^3 and yields 44% of its mass in CO2

when heated or exposed to acid.

So to get 10 tons of CO2 for every square meter on the surface of Mars you’d have to dig down

over 10 meters – across the entire planet!

That’s a few quadrillion tons of rock.

I hope you have your diamond pickaxe ready.

In reality of course we’d need to first locate and then dig down some kilometers before

we could access most of the carbonates.

Extracting such a quantity from depth is hard enough, but let’s think about processing it.

We can either heat the carbonates to hundreds of degrees Celsius or use acid to dissolve

We’d need to process around 20% of all Martian water via electrolysis to get that acid.

The electrolysis path might be better because it would give us oxygen as a byproduct of making that acid.

The energy cost in both cases is similar, though – several septillion joules.

Several thousand times the total annual energy consumption of the entire Earth.

That’s definitely sounding far-far future.

But not quite impossible.

Finally we actually have a picture of what terraforming Mars would actually look like.

Let’s say we want to finish the work in a single generation.

We’d need to cover much of the surface of Mars in solar cells made from abundant silicon

in the crust, or build 10 or so million gigawatt fusion power plants.

There’s really no other viable energy source.

We’d need to channel this energy deep into the crust to power vast hoards of robotic

miners-slash-processing plants, meanwhile pumping water from the icecaps across the

This could get us a carbon dioxide-oxygen atmosphere in a few decades, or in centuries

… or millenia if you scale down the power supply to something less insane.

Nonetheless, our descendants could see a Mars with sufficient air pressure and greenhouse

effect to allow liquid water to persist on the surface.

Now, Mars actually does have enough water for a few lakes and rivers.

The ice cap water would cover the entire surface to about 30 meters – which is not enough

to start a proper water cycle or have oceans,

but there may be a lot more water deeper in the crust.

We’d better hope so.

Our brand new CO2-oxygen atmosphere is not exactly earth-like.

In fact, it’s instantly and fatally toxic to humans and animals, and not so great for plant life.

Certain algaes can survive in a pure CO2 atmosphere –which is handy, because blue-green algae

– cyanobacteria - was responsible for first oxygenating Earth’s atmosphere.

And we’ll need that photosynthesis because otherwise oxygen will be quickly leeched from

the atmosphere as it oxidizes the surface.

So, there’s our next snapshot of the far future of a terraformed Mars – brand new oceans green with photosynthesizing, probably genetically-engineered, slime.

And perhaps eventually a breed of post-humans genetically or even cybernetically adapted

to deal with a CO2 atmosphere.

I just described the “easy” path to building an atmosphere on Mars.

It may be the only way to do it only using Martian materials.

Variations are possible - like introducing “super” greenhouse gases like CFCs.

But that still doesn’t give us the needed atmospheric pressure.

At any rate, to get a true Earth-like atmosphere we need a non-toxic filler molecule.

Nitrogen is much better - it works great on Earth anyway, but Mars has very little of the stuff.

To really build an Earth-like atmosphere we have to turn our eyes to the rest of the solar system.

One popular idea is just to smack some comets into Mars.

Comets contain tons of frozen volatiles – gas-forming molecules like CO2, H20 and the presence of

molecular nitrogen in comets was only recently confirmed by the Rosetta mission.

But how many comets do we need?

Well, assuming comets contain an amount of nitrogen similar to the composition of the

pre-solar nebula then can guess that around 5% of a comet’s mass is nitrogen.

That gives the typical medium-to-large comet a hundred billion tons of the stuff.

So, to build a quadrillion-ton nitrogen atmosphere that’s, like, 10,000 comets.

O-kay, so we’re still in far-future la-la land.

But it’s actually not significantly less crazy, or more crazy, than melting the Martian surface.

What would THIS effort look like?

Imagine this - a vast fleet of robotic spacecraft swarming the Kuiper belt, nudging its plentiful

iceballs in just the right way to send them plowing towards Mars.

Hopefully with exquisite aim, otherwise Earth is in for a pounding, also.

It would presumably take centuries to put such a fleet in place, and more centuries

to “de-orbit” those comets.

Once Mars has been suitably bombarded there’s still a lot of work tweaking the new atmosphere.

The good news is that those comets brought with them a LOT of water,

so we have deep global oceans at this point.

Let’s fast-forward several centuries.

Mars has an atmosphere – either released from deep in the crust or brought in from

the far outer solar system.

The last step is to protect the new atmosphere.

We canNOT restart Mars’ magnetic field – to do that we’d have to re-melt the entire

But we can try to build an external magnetic shield.

The easiest would be to do that in space – an orbiting field generator placed between Mars

and the Sun, like a giant space umbrella.

The resources and energy needed to build this is insane – but hey, we just built an atmosphere,

Honestly, all of this is pretty insane.

And frankly, unlikely.

Would we really muster the resources to terraform Mars if we can’t do the same to re-terraform

But there is another option.

Why build a sky if we can build a roof?

Instead of terraforming – what if we paraterraform.

Build what is known as a worldhouse.

We could cover vast tracts of land with an airtight bubble.

Or, more likely, many many connected bubbles.

These would be tall enough to encapsulate entire cities, and importantly –

plenty of Earth-like natural wilderness.

Oh, and I’m still a proponent of centrifuge cities – mag-lev rotating habitats to simulate

Earth gravity. Also shown rather beautifully in this more practical design by James Telfer.

If we wanted to cover, say, 10% of the Martian surface with a 300 meter tall worldhouse,

it'd require several orders of magnitude less material than building an entire atmosphere. So, say a handful of comets and/or the polar ice caps

should be enough to fill our worldhouse with air and water.

Now, without a real atmosphere, space radiation is gonna be a problem for our worldhouse, as is the constant bombardment of micro-meteors.

People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, nor live under a stone-throwing universe.

But perhaps there are advanced or just very, very thick materials that would serve.

So there’s our final image of humanity’s future on Mars: thousands of city-sized bubbles

spread across the still-barren landscape.

And inside each bubble an oasis – a lush, snow-globe replica of old Earth.

However we do it, Mars will surely be our first step, our proof of concept if we choose

that destiny - if we choose to terraform space time.

Thanks to LEGO – presenting LEGO City - for their support of PBS Digital Studios.

Can you believe it’s been 50 years since we landed on the moon?

It started out with one small step for man and now the journey to Mars is right around the corner!

Featuring sets inspired by real aerospace technology, LEGO City Space aims to inspire

future space explorers to imagine what role they can play to get us to the Red Planet.

To discover more go to the link in the description.

So we missed a couple of comment responses.

Today I'm going to cover two episodes: The episode "What Happened Before the Big Bang",

in which we look at eternal inflation. As well as the episode on the exciting possibility

that the North and South magnetic poles may be about to flip.

Wabi Sabi asks why the inflaton field is assumed to be a scalar field. Well, that's a great question - but I'm afraid the answer may not be satisfying.

It's because a scalar field is all you need.

This is the simplest type of quantum field, consisting of only a single scalar value at all points in space.

Give such a field a constant energy density and you get exponential expansion.

But more complex fields like vector fields and spinor fields can do the job too -

and some inflationary models use them, resulting in more complex inflation scenarios.

But many physicists argue that you shouldn't add unnecessary complexity, so a scalar field

tends to be the default for inflaton.

Joshua Kahky asks whether the Inflaton Field could also explain Dark Energy.

Well, the answer is yes, possibly. Inflation supposedly happened because the inflaton field had a very high energy density,

and it stopped when that energy dropped to a very low value.

But that low value may not have been zero.

If the inflaton field was left with a very tiny but positive energy density, then it's possible that it could now be powering the current accelerating expansion that we call dark energy.

But for that to happen, the inflaton field would have had to have transitioned between

two stable or semi-stable states that are a factor of 10^27 different in energy.

Now, we can try to imagine a single field with that property, or we can imagine two separate fields -

It's not clear which of those two imaginings is more of a stretch.

There were a lot more great questions on eternal inflation, but I'll get to those when we do

the eternal inflation challenge question answer episode.

For now, let's move on to the possible flipping of Earth's North and South magnetic poles.

EarthKnight points out that while Venus lacks an Earth-type intrinsic magnetic field,

the solar wind striking its atmosphere creates an induced magnetic field that does protects the planet.

That's a nice point, EarthKnight.

It's a very cool effect.

The solar wind partially ionizes Venus's upper atmosphere.

Electrical currents are induced and these produce a magnetic field that pushes back

against the Sun's magnetic field.

Venus's magnetic force-shield isn't nearly as strong as Earth's, however, so our Venusian

floating cloud cities had better still have very thick roofs.

As many viewers noted, what we currently call the north magnetic pole is technically a south

magnetic pole - as in, what we would call the south pole of a magnetic dipole or a bar magnet.

You know how the magnetic north pole of a bar magnet is attracted to the south pole of a second bar magnet?

Well, your compass's north pole is attracted to geographic north - which means geographic

north must correspond to a magnetic south pole.

Nolan Westrich, while laughing in Australian, notes that with the flipping of the magnetic

poles it will be America's turn to be upside down.

Well, given that the northern hemisphere is currently the magnetic south, I think that

means that North America, Europe, and most of Asia have been at bottom of the world all

this time without realizing it.

So hold onto something and don't look at the sky - it's a long way down.

Similar videos:

No Dark Matter = Proof of Dark Matter?
PBS Space Time
708.1K views 17.4K likes -1 dislikes 24 Apr 201996% match

The Holographic Universe Explained
PBS Space Time
3M views 42.5K likes -1 dislikes 10 Apr 201996% match

Loop Quantum Gravity Explained
PBS Space Time
1.2M views 27.3K likes -1 dislikes 15 Oct 201987% match

Does Consciousness Influence Quantum Mechanics?
PBS Space Time
1.9M views 46.9K likes -1 dislikes 18 Feb 202086% match

Does Time Cause Gravity?
PBS Space Time
2.3M views 58.4K likes -1 dislikes 24 Feb 202186% match

Is Earth's Magnetic Field Reversing?
PBS Space Time
1.3M views 31K likes -1 dislikes 03 Sep 201985% match

What Happened Before the Big Bang?
PBS Space Time
1.6M views 32.7K likes -1 dislikes 19 Aug 201985% match

Is Pluto a Planet?
PBS Space Time
554.4K views 16.4K likes -1 dislikes 23 Sep 201985% match

Deciphering The Vast Scale of the Universe | STELLAR
PBS Space Time
982.5K views 24.4K likes -1 dislikes 25 Jul 201985% match

How Black Holes Kill Galaxies
PBS Space Time
1M views 19.9K likes -1 dislikes 17 Jun 201985% match

Did Time Start at the Big Bang?
PBS Space Time
2.3M views 49.4K likes -1 dislikes 18 Jul 201985% match

The Quantum Internet
PBS Space Time
569K views 20.7K likes -1 dislikes 15 Jul 201985% match

How Many Universes Are There?
PBS Space Time
1M views 21.5K likes -1 dislikes 30 Sep 201985% match

What Caused the Big Bang?
PBS Space Time
1.3M views 27.8K likes -1 dislikes 06 Aug 201985% match

How Does Gravity Warp the Flow of Time?
PBS Space Time
1.1M views 32.5K likes -1 dislikes 10 Feb 202182% match

The Alchemy of Neutron Star Collisions
PBS Space Time
933.1K views 19.5K likes -1 dislikes 06 Jun 201982% match

The Cosmic Dark Ages
PBS Space Time
686.4K views 15.1K likes -1 dislikes 16 May 201980% match

Solving the Three Body Problem
PBS Space Time
1.1M views 30.3K likes -1 dislikes 20 Jan 202079% match

Will Wormholes Allow Fast Interstellar Travel?
PBS Space Time
1.4M views 31.5K likes -1 dislikes 22 Apr 202078% match

Venus May Have Life!
PBS Space Time
475.4K views 21.5K likes 449 dislikes 05 Oct 202078% match

Hacking the Nature of Reality
PBS Space Time
757.3K views 18.9K likes -1 dislikes 27 Jan 202075% match

Can We Break the Universe?
PBS Space Time
938.4K views 30.5K likes -1 dislikes 19 Jan 202174% match

Is The Universe Finite?
PBS Space Time
1.6M views 31.8K likes -1 dislikes 02 Dec 201974% match

Gravitational Wave Background Discovered?
PBS Space Time
910.5K views 28.3K likes -1 dislikes 17 Feb 202173% match

Is Time Travel Impossible?
PBS Space Time
926.6K views 24.7K likes -1 dislikes 21 Oct 201973% match

Navigating with Quantum Entanglement
PBS Space Time
620K views 21K likes -1 dislikes 22 Dec 202072% match

The Supernova At The End of Time
PBS Space Time
994.3K views 26.1K likes -1 dislikes 15 Dec 202072% match

The NEW Crisis in Cosmology
PBS Space Time
1.8M views 48.7K likes -1 dislikes 16 Mar 202172% match

Do the Past and Future Exist?
PBS Space Time
1.2M views 40.4K likes 837 dislikes 13 Oct 202072% match

Why Do You Remember The Past But Not The Future?
PBS Space Time
937.1K views 28.3K likes -1 dislikes 08 Dec 202072% match

Settings Privacy About Contact Donate